MAR-B-10

 

MY RESPONSE TO A WILDERNESS ACQUISITION OF A DEER TICK

AND ITS MANAGEMENT

 

I picked this up at Camp Lejeune in NC last weekend. It is probably a deer

tick - I managed to save it, it's crawling around in a plastic baggy on top

of the fridge. Pinhead size. An unbelievable infestation of these things

down there, way beyond all my past experience in tick environments.

 

No necrosis, just a raised central red welt about 3/4" across. No bulls eye

pattern. It was not big and engorged.

 

But, I have been lucky in the past so this one was disturbing. Thanks for

getting back to me.

 

At 09:12 AM 3/14/2002 -0500, you wrote:

>Dear Chris:

>

>I just got your call now--I hope I am not too late!  (If it were a matter

>of life and death, you can be assured I would have found you!)

>

>First, yes, I plan to be here on April 2, so let me know details of when

>and where the Board Meeting will be held.

>

>Second--NO, do not worry now, except if there is a local inflammatory

>reaction that looks necrotic, and then we would treat only the local

>manifestations of the tick bite.

>

>if you have a significant local reaction, I would calling a script for

>Doxycycline, (which I myself have been on for the past month as an

>antimalarial prophylaxis). This would cover any systemic signs of the

>disease.  A single hazard for an outdoorsman on this drug is taht one

>should be very careful about sun exposure while taking it.

>

>There are many tick-borne illnesses, but they are rare--even in

>ticks.  The most common one here is Rocky mountain Spotted Fever, which is

>treatable and curable with the antibiotic I just mentioned, and a number

>of other illnesses for which children are principally at risk.  These

>sound bad, such as an ascending paralysis, mimicking polio, but are rarer

>than hen's teeth and are treated by support.  The others come from

>epidemics--of the kind not currently going through here.  But, all of the

>above are borne by the common tick--the dog tick, the kind you can see

>without magnifiers, Dermacentor andersoni.  So, if you saw the tick, and

>it was big and engorged--as you have no doubt seen them on dogs or,

>perhaps, self, the worries are principally just the local skin

>inflammation and the other rarer instances I just mentioned, and for which

>Doxy would be the treatment IF, and not WHEN systemic symptoms

>occur--fever, generalized spotty rash.

>

>Now, for the other kind of tick also endemic here, the deer tick, these

>are so minute as to be invisible except in a concerted search for them, so

>most people never find them upon their person.  So, when someone reports a

>"tick bite" I assume it is a dog tick if they have seen it.

>

>As everyone knows, there is a joint and muscle systemic illness that comes

>from the deer tick--Lyme Disease.  it is over-diagnosed, has very poor

>serologic testing capability with a lot of false negatives, and is a

>lasting debilitating disease.  If someone has such an illness, I treat

>empirically with or without evidence form the poor diagnostic tests, with

>the same tetracycline family of antibiotics, with only slow and variable

>improvement, hardly distinguishable form the natural history course of the

>disease itself.

>

>For future reference, if someone is a deer hunter, outdoorsman, camper,

>spending more than the average "Summer Vacation" period of time in

>exposure to the deer tick environment (e.g a logger) I would recommend

>the  new Lyme vaccine, even though it has some questionable effectiveness

>and is expensive.

>

>As for someone who is a WFA instructor or is out in the Outward Bound

>wilderness regularly--take me for example, in the wildernesses of the

>world exposed to nearly everything and far from any medical aid I do not

>carry with me--I have NOT had the Lyme vaccine, and, even as ardent a deer

>hunter as I might happen to be, I have no plans to get it. The risks and

>expense are not warranted in view of the very low probability of the

>event, which is "diagnosed" as a "wastebasket" specific etiologic

>condition about ten times more frequently than it occurs.

>

>I hope this is helpful and that you can now "Tick Off" this worry from

>your list!

>

>Cheers!

 

Return to Mars Index

Return to Journal Index