NOV-A-10

 

THE RECENT PROBLEMS IN NEPAL REFLECTED IN

MMI CANCELLATION AND A NY TIMES STORY

 

 

Gi Dr. Glenn,

I just came from Leyte where MMI did a 2-week surigcal/ental project. Leyte
was an alternate choice when the MMI Project to Nepal was cancelled.
Inspite of the limited time of dessimination, and the 3 non-working
holidays during the 2-week proejct, by God's grace, we did 89 surgical
procedures (56 majors), extracted teethg from 289 ptes, with an average of
65 OPD consultations/day. Thse bulk of patients and surgery was a first for
LBH. But the staff carrie the task very well. They welcomed us warmly and
the joy of serving the Lord among them was very evident.

As for the Tboli/Malyabalay it will be on Feb. 7-21, 2004. I am sorry to
hear that you may not be able to join us at this time. Well, we are a bit
saddened by this news because we've been l;ooking ofrward to seeing you
again. Besides, your devotion and skill in surgery, had ministered to so
many here, and so, they are hoping to see you again! So, we'll pray that
you can still make it here - if not for the whole two weeks, but maybe for
only a week.


God bless you evermore!
Allan

 


As I was saying....

 

GWG
>>> kevin bergman <kbergman@yahoo.com> 11/12/03 12:56PM >>>
fyi regarding
nepal.
--- "Gordon, Michael" <Michael.Gordon@wilmer.com>
wrote:
> Subject: FW: NYTimes.com Article: Op-Ed Contributor:
> Dark Days in Shangri-La
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 10:11:37 -0500
> From: "Gordon, Michael" <Michael.Gordon@wilmer.com>
> To: "Sara R. Gordon (E-mail)" <sgordon@amchp.org>,
>     "Kevin Bergman (E-mail)" <kbergman@yahoo.com>,
>     "Mike Lowe (E-mail)" <mike_lowe@hotmail.com>
>
>
> More on Nepal.
>
>
> Op-Ed Contributor: Dark Days in Shangri-La
>
>
November 10, 2003
>  By SAMRAT UPADHYAY
>
>
BLOOMINGTON, Ind. - In the 60's Nepal was a
> hashish-filled
> Shangri-La for hippies. In the 80's its hills
> swarmed with
> trekkers catching the evening sun as it hit
>
Annapurna. Now
> a more sinister show is playing in the villages and
> in the
> capital,
Katmandu - and it should make Americans
> worry.
>
> For seven years, Maoist rebels have been waging a
> "people's
> war" that has turned this once-peaceful nation of 25
> million, Lord Buddha's birthplace, into a killing
> field
> with thousands dead. In language that frighteningly
> invokes
> Pol Pot's
Cambodia, they've vowed to kill millions
> more and
> "hoist the hammer and sickle atop
Mount Everest." In
> August, after a seven-month cease-fire that allowed
> them to
> regroup, the Maoists began striking fiercely, and
> most
> Nepalis fear what will happen if they win.
>
> If
Nepal turns into a Maoist totalitarian state, it
> could
> alter the security balance throughout
South Asia. In
> this
> geopolitically important area, already rent by
> nuclear-fueled one-upmanship between
India and
>
Pakistan,
> this is a risk the world cannot afford.
>
> The Maoists have already formed close alliances with
> leftist extremists in the Indian states of West
>
Bengal and
>
Sikkim; the rebels often hide over the border in
> northern
>
India, and the Indian government has made little
> effort to
> crack down on them. There are reports of cooperation
> with
> Communist factions from the
Philippines, Peru and
>
Turkey.
> The rebels model their approach after
Peru's
> murderous
> Shining Path guerrilla movement: voice the
> aspirations of
> the poor, fight state oppression and police
> brutality, use
> violence as a means to justice.
>
> The rebels apparently see no paradox in their
> clinging to
> the revolutionary doctrines of Mao Zedong, even as
> his
> heirs in
Beijing show an interest in helping the
> Nepali
> government defeat the insurrection. They also openly
> admire
> the late North Korean dictator Kim Il Sung, and
> could turn
>
Nepal into another Hermit Kingdom: isolated, bitter
> and in
> constant friction with its neighbors.
>
> And at a time when the
United States could do
> without more
> adversaries, the virulently anti-American stance of
> the
> Maoists could turn
Nepal into a breeding ground -
> not
> unlike
Taliban-era Afghanistan - for those who want
> to
> strike back at the great "imperialist" nation in
> retaliation for real or imaginary injuries.
>
> When they began their insurgency eight years ago,
> the
> Maoists - with their promise of land reforms, free
> education and universal health care - garnered
> support from
> rural Nepalis suffering from decades of extreme
> poverty,
> illiteracy and caste and ethnic prejudice. Even
> urban
> elites saw them as an antidote to the failed
> leadership of
> corrupt and querulous political parties. But as the
> Maoists
> began snuffing innocent lives and calling it
> "collateral
> damage," public sentiment has largely turned against
> them.
>
> Since 1995 the Maoists, with their 8,000 regular
> troops
> and perhaps as many as 40,000 irregular fighters,
> have been
> conducting sneak attacks against police and army
> posts,
> blowing up bridges, and publicly beheading alleged
> enemies
> and spies.
>
> Tourism, a mainstay of the Nepali economy, has been
> hit
> hard, as have primary sources of foreign exchange
> like
> textile and carpet manufacturing. "Business people
> are
> scared of the Maoists, who appear relentless in
> their
> efforts to destroy factories by setting them on
> fire," said
> Ashutosh Tiwari, a business consultant in
Katmandu.
> "They
> rob banks, call for nationwide strikes and extort
> money -
> called a `Maoist tax' - from business people."
>
> The public is caught in the middle of the civil war.
> Last
> month four schoolchildren were killed in the
> crossfire
> between the army and the Maoists. In the past two
> years
> more than 5,000 people - army, Maoists and civilians
> - have
> died. Amnesty International has criticized the
> Maoists for
> "scores of abductions and kidnappings," but also
> condemned
> the army for arbitrary arrests and 250 cases of
> suspect
> "disappearances."
>
>
Nepal's monarchy has only compounded the problem. A
> year
> ago King Gyanendra fired the prime minister for
> supposed
> incompetence and dissolved the Parliament. For some
> Nepalis, this raised anxieties that the country was
> reverting to the repressive Panchayat regime that
> ran the
> country from 1962 to 1990 under the crown's absolute
> rule.
> Others lauded the king's "active" hand: 12 years of
> democracy hadn't worked, and it was time the king
> took
> control.
>
> In traditional Nepali thought, the monarch is an
> incarnation of Hindu god Vishnu, preserver of life.
> To some
> extent, this hold over the people remains, although
> it took
> a blow two years ago when Crown Prince Dipendra,
> drunk and
> drugged, gunned down 10 relatives, including his
> father,
> King Birendra.
>
> In February, Nepalis sighed with relief when the
> Maoists
> began negotiations with the government. A strident
> war of
> words, however, soon replaced dialogue, and the
> rebels went
> deeper into hiding. Their chief demand is for an
> assembly
> to redraft the Constitution, making the crown either
> powerless or obsolete. They also want the government
> to
> oust American military advisers and to terminate the
> country's counterterrorism agreement with the United
> States.
>
>
Nepal isn't an Islamic country, it doesn't possess
> nuclear
> weapons, and it's small. But
America should treat
>
Nepal's
> insurgency problem as another potential
Afghanistan
> - the
> Maoists' hard-core Communist ideology more than
> compensates
> for their lack of religious fervor. Should
America
> intervene militarily, however, the Maoists' leader,
> Baburam
> Bhattarai, has warned of "another
Vietnam." More to
> the
> point, ordinary Nepalis reject foreign interference
> in
> solving their country's problems, and the
> American-led
> invasions of
Afghanistan and Iraq have solidified
> Nepalis'
> suspicion about
America's true motives.
>
> So what can the
United States do? Instead of
> military aid
> (last year Congress approved $20 million in
> emergency
> military aid to help fight the insurgents),
America
> should
> push for democratic change. King Gyanendra's
> executive fiat
> hasn't solved the Maoist problem, and his
> government's
> recent hasty appointments of party members to local
> administrative posts damningly resembles the
> pre-democratic
> Panchayat rule.
>
> Rather than hoping that a firm hand will subdue the
> rebellion,
America should make its $27 million in
> annual
> economic aid to
Nepal contingent on the king's
> moving
> toward new elections under a multiparty interim
> government.
> "Let the executive powers go back to the people,"
> says
> Akhilesh Upadhyay (no relation), an editor at The
>
Katmandu
> Post. As for
India, Saubhagya Shah, a leading
> Nepalese
> scholar, says the
United States should "convince
>
India to
> shut down Maoist bases on its territory and
> extradite the
> rebel leadership."
>
> Since the end of the cease-fire in August, more than
> a
> thousand Nepali lives have been lost. But the Maoist
> insurgency is not simply about terrorists: it's
> about the
> problems of a struggling democracy. These
> difficulties are
> shared with many other countries around the world,
> and each
> is a test case of
America's commitment to spreading
> its
> ideals of liberty and freedom.
>
> For years Nepalis suffered under absolute monarchy,
> which
> provided the foundation for Maoist ideologues to
> garner
> support among the oppressed. The only way out of
> this
> quagmire is more democracy, not less.
>
> Samrat Upadhyay, author of the novel "The Guru of
> Love,"
> teaches creative writing at the
Indiana University.
>
>
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/10/opinion/10UPAD.html?ex=1069649636&ei=1&en=ed1707612264696a
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper.

> Imagine
> reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you
> like!
> Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons.
> Enjoy
> now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html
>
>
>
> HOW TO ADVERTISE
> ---------------------------------
> For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
>
> or other creative advertising opportunities with The
>
> New York Times on the Web, please contact
> onlinesales@nytimes.com or visit our online media
> kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo
>
> For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
> help@nytimes.com. 
>
> Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

Return to November Index

Return to Journal Index